Videos·Nov 4, 2026·11 min

Aurora Stock (AUR): What Has to Go Right for $11.55?

AUR

Chapters

Did you catch it?

3 quick questions on this video. It's step 5 of the Read a stock like an auditor path, and passing here counts there too.

1. Starting in 2027, how does Aurora want to make money under its "driver as a service" model?
2. Hirschbach and Charger Logistics each laid out plans to run 500 trucks. Why does Blake say not to count on those yet?
3. Aurora raised about $256 million through an "at the market" program. What does that mean for shareholders?

Transcript

What I say in the video, from its captions. Press a time to play the video from there.

Aurora’s driverless trucks and the analyst target

This isn't a someday stock, because Aurora's trucks are already hauling paid freight on Texas highways with nobody in the driver's seat. Aurora Innovation ticker symbol AUR closed November 2nd at $4.23 and the average target from 13 analysts tracked by stock analysis is $11.55 implying about a 173% upside. So, if you're bullish, you want to know what has to go right. And if you think this is a cash bonfire, the stock just fell about 14% in two days after Aurora cut its revenue guidance.

It started on April 27, 2025, when an Aurora truck drove from Dallas to Houston on I-45 with nobody behind the wheel and hauled pastries on the way back. Aurora CEO Chris Urmson rode along in the backseat that day and his review was quote "it's novel, it's technically extraordinary and yet it's all pretty boring." Boring is exactly what you want with a truck that can weigh up to 40 tons. I live in Texas so this one hits close to home because every driverless lane Aurora has announced so far starts or ends in the Lone Star state.

Texas routes and the driverless advantage

Dallas to Houston on I-45, Fort Worth, to El Paso, about 600 miles. Dallas down to Laredo, where Urmson says nearshoring is driving unprecedented freight volume, and Fort Worth, all the way to Phoenix, a run of about a thousand miles. That Phoenix run is longer than one human driver is legally allowed to cover in a single shift, because federal rules cap a trucker at 11 hours of driving before a 10-hour break. Aurora's trucks don't need a nap. Aurora says its trucks are running at a pace of more than 225,000 miles a year for customers like Werner and McLane, which is more than double a normal truck.

So fuel economy savings, savings and insurance, savings and the cost of actually driving it, and then dramatically increasing utilization as well. More miles per truck is the whole business.

Observers, weather and warning triangles

But it hasn't quite been a straight line. Not long after launch, Aurora put a person back in the cab of its PACCAR trucks because PACCAR asked for an observer to ride along. Aurora still counted those runs as driverless, since the observer wasn't driving. Which is technically true in the same way your driving instructor technically isn't driving. That changed this summer when we launched a new fleet built on international LT trucks, in Urmson's words, "without a person behind the wheel."

Weather was the other problem. Aurora says bad weather held back its Texas driverless runs about 40% of the time in 2025, until it cleared the system for rain, fog, and heavy wind. But the strangest problem was the one no one thinks about. When a truck stops on the shoulder, federal rules say the driver has to set out warning triangles, and there's no driver to get out and do that. Maybe eventually Tesla's humanoid robots could solve that problem.

So Aurora asked to use flashing beacons mounted on the cab instead. And now it has a five-year exemption from the FMCSA, the federal agency that regulates trucking. Self-driving, it turns out, is mostly weather and paperwork. So how does any of this turn into money?

How Aurora makes money

Right now Aurora is basically running the food truck itself. It owns the trucks, it handles the driving, and it charges about $2 a mile. Fuel surcharge included, which Aurora calls transport as a service. But starting in 2027, Aurora wants to stop running the food trucks and sell the recipe. Under that model, carriers buy their own trucks from Volvo or PACCAR and pay Aurora about 85 cents a mile for the Aurora driver, which is the software, sensors and computer that do the driving.

That's what Aurora calls "driver" as a service, and it's the part Wall Street gets excited about. Aurora stops paying for trucks and keeps collecting on every mile. Which is why the partners matter so much. PACCAR, the company behind Peterbilt and Kenworth, is working to put the Aurora driver on its production trucks, and Volvo plans to put more than 300 driverless trucks on the road in 2027. The partnership has shifted now from developing autonomous trucking technology to its industrialising our joint autonomous trucking solution.

The hardware kit is built with AUMOVIO at a plant in New Braunfels, Texas with production planned for the second half of 2027. So the pieces are real. and the launch customers back on that pastry run were Uber Freight and Hirschbach, which tells you demand side showed up on day one.

The production delay and guidance cut

But the business only works at scale. So here's the scoreboard Aurora gave itself for 2026. More than 200 driverless trucks on the road by year end, and $14 to $16 million in revenue. So, how's it going? In its latest report, Aurora said production is running about six weeks behind, so the 200-truck goal slid to the end of February. And 2026 revenue is now expected to be about 9 million. That's the revenue guidance going from $14 million to $16 million down to about $9 million.

The trucks that were supposed to earn it are still being built. On the call, Urmson blamed material availability, component quality, and problems at the end of the production line. Right now, Aurora says it has 20+ driverless trucks built and coming into the fleet, and it's aiming to build 20 trucks a week by early December. Which is rough news for Wojak, who bought in September because 200 trucks by New Year's felt like a sure thing. The stock dropped from about $5.10 to $4.41 the next day.

And analysts started trimming, as they always do when the price goes down. Cantor Fitzgerald cut its target from $12 to $11. Northland from $11 to $10 and Needham went to $10 as well. Notice how the analysts cut their price targets after the price drops. That's usually how things go down just a general rule, but kind of interesting. Every one of them kept a buy rating, and Morgan Stanley stayed at $18 the highest on the street, while Goldman Sachs sits way down at $7 with the equivalent of a hold.

Put that together and the targets run from under $4 at the low end to $18 at the top. So that average target is a crowd that really does not agree. It's more than a dozen analyst guesses averaged together, and the middle guess is lower at ten dollars and fifty cents.

Four things that have to go right

So what has to happen to get from a little over $4 to almost $12 at the average target or where it would be worth well over $20 billion versus about $8.5 billion at that closing price? I see four things that have to go right and they come in order. Number one is exceeding 200 trucks by the end of February, 2027. The next earnings report is a separate checkpoint. And if it comes before month end, Aurora may still be working toward that deadline. If Aurora misses the new date too, that's two slips in a row.

In my opinion, that's right about when the market stops giving credit for promises. Number two is the switch to selling the driver. Volvo's driverless trucks are supposed to launch with the Aurora driver in the first quarter of 2027. And Hirschbach and Charger Logistics have each laid out plans to run 500 trucks. But both of those plans are non-binding "memorandums of understanding." That's basically a handshake on paper that nobody can be held to yet.

Chad reads plans for 500 trucks and starts pricing out a boat. And Tradwife reads the word "non-binding" and puts the boat brochure back in the drawer. Number 3 is scale. More than 1000 driverless trucks by the end of 2027, which Aurora says it's still on track for and break even gross margins around the 500 truck mark. In food truck terms, gross margin is what's left from each plate after paying for the ingredients, so break even means each plate finally pays for itself, before anyone pays the chefs who wrote the recipe.

Cash runway and share dilution

Which brings us number 4, the one I care about the most as a former auditor and a former financial accountant at a solar company that went bankrupt. Now can Aurora pay for all this without flooding the market with new shares? Aurora used about $170 million of cash running the business last quarter, plus more on trucks and equipment, and it expects to use about $250 million in the current quarter. It ended September with just over $1 billion in cash and short-term investments.

So how long does that last? If you just divide 1 billion by about 250 million a quarter, you get roughly a year. And that's my napkin math, not company guidance. My friends, we are talking about the cash runway, and it doesn't really look that long here. A year is not a long time. Back in February Aurora said it had enough money to reach positive free cash flow in 2028, meaning cash left over after paying for everything. I didn't see that line repeated in the October letter.

So the gap gets filled the usual way by selling new shares of the stock. Over the last two quarters, Aurora raised about $256 million through what's called an "at the market" program. And at the market program, basically just means the company quietly sells new shares into the market a little at a time. And some of that money went to cover taxes on employee stock awards. Total shares went from about 1.94 billion at the end of 2025 to just over 2 billion by September, which is up almost 4% in 9 months.

Now almost 4% isn't scary by itself. But if Aurora needs another big check in 2027, with the stock in the 4s, it has to sell a lot more shares to raise the same money than it would at $8 a share. That's the part Doomer keeps circling. Every new share is one more person squeezing into the same cab, and everybody's seat gets a little smaller.

The bull case and the bear case

So let's get both sides of the mic. Positive Pete gets to go first. Pete's case is that Aurora got there first. At least by its own count. It says it has more than 500,000 driverless miles, with 100% on time delivery. And it's aiming to go from about 200 trucks to tens of thousands by 2030. At that size, management talks about roughly $5 billion a year in revenue, with software-style margins on the driver business. Urmson isn't shy about it, either.

On the July earnings call, he said. If you're not using our stuff in the next five years, you just won't be competitive in long haul. Pete's point is that if even part of that shows up, about $8.5 billion at that closing price does not look expensive. That's the bull case. Negative Nelly's case is that Aurora keeps missing its own calendar. The 2026 goal started as more than 200 trucks, became just 200 trucks, and became the end of February. And the revenue guidance just got cut by about 40%.

She'd also point out that Aurora lost roughly $78 for every $1 revenue it brought in last quarter. Plus, Aurora isn't the only company chasing driverless freight, since rivals like Kodiak are running their own trucks in Texas too. Honestly, both of them are right about something.

Two dates and one number to watch

So here's how I'd actually use this, and a quick disclosure first. At the time of recording this video, I do not own Aurora Stock. Instead of the target, I'd watch two dates and one number. Date one is the end of February 2027, has Aurora exceeded 200 driverless trucks. An earnings report before that deadline can show progress, but it can't confirm a milestone the company hasn't reached yet. Date number two is the end of the first half of 2027. Do Volvo's trucks launch with the Aurora driver and do Hirschbach and Charger turn those handshakes into signed contracts.

The number is the share count. Continued dilution means the business has to create more value just to deliver the same upside per share, even if the trucks show up right on time. If you're tempted anyways, size it like a bet that can get cut in half because it nearly has been already, from $8.57 at its 52-week high to its November 2nd close. That first load of pastry has made it to Dallas on time. Whatever the stock does is the part that nobody can schedule.

Would you drive next to one of these? Tell me in the comments below. This one drove itself right over to you, and unlike Aurora, it's right on schedule.

The stocks in this video

More videos

Search all 61 videos →

This is education, not investment advice, and figures are as of the day the video came out. Full disclaimer. Spot a mistake? Tell me.